Friday, December 31, 2004

Israel and Palestine visit

The night before my friend Matt sent me the Canadian Embassy warning strongly discouraging travel to Israel and especially the west bank. This started to get me concerned.

Then my first day in Israel consisted of being bullied/grilled/interviewed by four seperate Israeli security agents, then going through two seperate Israeli Army checkpoints and then meeting my guide in Bethlehem who had been shot by the Israeli army last year.

This combined with warnings not to mention the west bank when leaving Israel and definetely not to mention the names of people met in the West Bank gave me a pretty serious case of fear and paranoia about Israeli Security. They had my email address and I did not want to post anything about Israel while I was in Israel.

My fear and paranoia was exaggerated by the particular path I took into Israel. I think if I had hung around in Tel Aviv a bit more and had not had so much coffee my first day - I would have been far more relaxed.

To mitigate the risk of visiting Israel, I thought I should sign up for a tour. Someone who knew the ropes of the country. My tour was excellent, and I did not experience any violence, but because it spent alot of time in the Palestian Territories I was concerned about more security interviews.

I learned a little more about the Palestinian situation there. The Palestinians are not treated very well and their cities and economy are being shut down by the Israelis. All of the Palestinians I met in the Occupied Territories where friendly and wanted more "Internationals" to come to their cities to help see what is going on. Based on some of the questions in the security interviews (why do you want to come here NOW...), I don't think Israel is welcoming to any international presence here.

By visiting, I became what I would call accidentally important.

As far as my personal security is concerned, I was safe. According to my guide, I needed only to worry if I got involved in any sort of checkpoint protest or if there was a suicide bomb which would then mean a retribution attack. The retribution is apparently an arrest of the entire family and a destruction of their homes. During my visit I saw a Palestinian home that had been destroyed for this reason.

Actually compared to everywhere else I was visited, for petty crime, I was safer. No one in Bethlehem or Beit Sahour was going to steal anything. Within Israel, I also felt very safe (petty crime wise) as well.

Ok. So more details on what is going on. Basically from what I can see is that the Palestinians are under seige. Their territories are encircled and being subdivided in several ways.

First, to get to Palestine you need to get through Israel. If you say you are going into the Palestinian Territories you will be hassled more at the airport. If you are Palestinian, you cannot get out of the occupied territitories and you need a special permit to use the airport. Most Palestinians have to cross to Jordan to fly out. All goods going in and out of Palestine must also go through Israel and are subject to Israeli taxes etc.

Second army checkpoints are put on roadways. The checkpoint are usually easy to drive into, but hard to get out. Israelies are not allowed (by Israel) to enter the Palestinian territories. Palestinans are not allowed to enter Israel unless they have permission (by Israel). I met Israelis in the Occupied Territories, who were mostly concerned about the consequences of spending the night there. To get out, you need to wait in line and show a passport or permission to exit. The impact of this is mostly a big hassle. Half the time we circumvented the checkpoints by going to roadblocks which are not controlled by the Israeli army. You cannot drive through though. You need to walk across and take a taxi from the other side. Apparently there are all sorts of other inconvenient ways to get in and out of the occupied territories.

Thrird, Israel is builing a huge huge wall to encircle the west bank cities.

Fourth, Israel is importing Romanian and other (Phillipine?) workers to eliminate it's dependency on the Palestinian workforce.

Fifth, settlements are being built which are encroaching on Palestinian towns. Wherever a settlement is built there needs to be Israeli security which then shuts down roads for security reasons. There are some really passionate settlers that believe that it is their duty as Jews to make Isreal a Jewish only state. These settlers will sometimes illegally occupy Palestinan homes inside the the zones and will then get support from the Army. Right now, the settlers are threatening violence against the Israeli police if they have to withdraw from Gaza. From a side-street in Hebron, I saw a settler with his shopping from walking - striding really - down a road protected by chain link fences. I was surprised that he was alone and just glared at us as he walked by. Shortly though, about eight soldiers walked by behind him. One soldier with his rifle held to keep aim down our street as they walked by. The soldiers were then followed by a military vehicle.

Sixth, to link settlements, settler only roads are built which in somecases bisect the Palestinian cities. Palestinians cannot drive across them. These roads are protected by two levels of alarmed and electrified fences as well as Army patrols.

From the Israeli side of things, I think there is a range of opinions. At one end are those who believe in a pure Jewish state. At the other end, there are those who want to have a peaceful co-existence with the Palestinians.

3 comments:

Sean said...

I have not finished figuring out what is going on in Israel....

Nor do I know the solution. As you may have noticed above, I tried to keep to a description of what is happening in the present there.

I tried to avoid discussing ideas about what the motives are, what the history is and what the future does or should hold. I am less confident here.

So I am going to be a bit rambly and probably dead wrong in some of my thoughts.

There is the issue of a conquered people. Did the Israelies conquer the Palestinians in 1967? If so, what does that entitle them to? I met a Christian activist in Hebron called Art Gish (for some reason I think I have heard his name before) working for the Christian Peacekeeping Team. He said his group has representatives in Palestine, Iraq and .... ONTARIO. We did not discuss it much, but he said that we Canadians were mistreating the First Nations people. Anyway, the conqured people concept is what I think distinguishes Canadian native issues from American ones. The Americans conquered the Natives. We in Canada sorta moved them out of the way. So there is a parallel here.

There is an issue of legal entitlement. What did the English promise the Israelis? Is this relevant?

Then there is the role of the Holocaust. An interesting idea was explained to me by an Israeli peace activist who said: "The holocaust experience drives the Israeli concept of Peace through Power".

Also, I read that some settlers believe the Holocaust was an act of God, designed to punish the Jews for not having established a homeland and that they must establish one to fulfill God's will.

Then there is the politicization of the Holocaust. Some activists consider some of the Israeli actions against the Palestinians to be very similar in spirit to the ones in the Holocaust. Right now, though the Settlers in the Gaza strip are using imagery (wearing orange stars) from the Holocaust to argue that they are being persecuted (by their own government) by withdrawing from Gaza.

Regarding the ideas of terrorism, I did not get in contact with any suicide bomber families or find out first hand more information about this (I did visit a bombing site in Tel Aviv).

What I do have is one Palestian man who explained to me that he was not a terrorist. But if someone killed his children, then he would be.

An activist explained to me that there is a Palestinan dynamic between normal teenage depression going on and the fact that there is a very visible oppression which might explain their depression. This may drive new suicide bombers.

Another person suggested the notion that a suicide bomber is the poor man's airforce. For me this is an interesting idea because it suggests the idea of comparing or treating a suicide bombing against a bombing by an F-16 (jet). So... what IS the difference?

In discussing this I feel like it might be interpreted as apologistic. I am not apologistic though. What I do really think though is that the terror threat can be treated and should be treated seperately from the political struggle.

Changing subjects again. The seperation of church and state is a good idea...

And again.... Abstraction and justice...

It is challenging to correleate things that happen on a person to person basis when it is abstracted up into a people versus people concept.

Though I think that a commitment to maintaining adherence to the concept of human rights in struggles can help preserve justice even when issues become more abstract.

Sean said...

On my last couple days in Jerusalem and in Tel Aviv I was hanging around with an American named Mike. He had spent some time in the Palestinian territories as well as in Tel Aviv.

What is interesting to me is how outraged he was when there was a bunch of settlers coming into the bar we were in. Turns out Mike is a lieutenant in the U.S. Army who will be going to Iraq in a couple months. He will be responsible for a about 16 guys there I think.

Settlers are allowed to carry guns. Basically they are dressed like you and me, but need guns to be safe on their way back to the settlements. Mike thought it was insane to go spend the evening drinking, then drive home with their M16s and M4s.

Mike also noticed on a bus that an Israeli soldier did not have his safety on. His weapon had a magazine. Mike could not tell if there was a bullet in the chamber, but was surprised that he was defending his trigger with his hand. Mike motioned to the soldier to let him know and the soldier looked at the safety and brushed him off.

What was really interesting to me was Mike's perspective on security and weapons in Israel considering his background. (There are alot. The bus I took to Eliat had about 20% soldiers so there was probably about 20 M-16s on that bus.)

Mike has about 2 years left in the military to pay back his ROTC (university education in Latin American Studies). His concern about going to Iraq is that no one in his squad loses their life. One of his best friends was just killed there and he and his friends are trying to make some sort of trust fund for his dead friend's newborn daughter. To give her the message that her father was so liked and was such a good man that his friends wanted to care for her - even though she never really met him and they never met her.

Anonymous said...

Thanks for your courageous reportage, I understand a little better now.